|
Constitutional Liberal
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Seasonal locations
Posts: 14,797
|
Well, the show has aired and it lived up to the hype.
I enjoyed the show if for the historical references alone.
It was entertaining all be it the arguments for it's hypothesis were worthy of Johnny Cochran himself.
The OJ jury would have bought it on face value. Cheap cinematic tricks were employed to walk you down a path that reason would steer you away from.
If you were so inclined before the airing, you could easily be convinced that the Jesus of the bible did not exist as Christians would believe.
As a person of faith I saw no compelling evidence of any significance.
"If this- then this" was carried to it's highest level.
If there is a yellow egg and a blue egg it must be Easter. Don't worry that it's only January.
Any show that invokes the name of Jesus over and over again is show deserving air time.
Two thumbs up for the content two thumbs down for the conclusions based on fabrication.
__________________
Jim
“Rhetoric is no substitute for reality.”
― Thomas Sowell
Last edited by Turbo_pro; 03-04-2007 at 10:02 PM..
|