Quote:
Originally posted by the
This is the main issue of interest (the other stuff seems like so The new Democratic president will appoint USAs who are not likely to investigate Dems, and will remove those that are. Same if a Repub. president is appointed. The president is entitled to appoint USA's who share their agenda and viewpoint. And if a Dem is elected president and a USA slips by who appears to be focusing on investigating Democrats, you can be sure the Dem president will be quick to remove that person, too. Why keep someone who serves at your pleasure, but is diametrically opposed to your viewpoint? The president (Dem or Rep) won't, and isn't required to. In that regard, it's good to be king.
|
So it would be okay for a Republican President to instruct every federal prosecutor in the country to investigate and indict only Democrats, and vice-versa? That is a desirable way to run the country? This is
North America, not South America.