[snowman]

The basic POINT is that we do NOT UNDERSTAND, nor does any scientist understand the global climate. We cannot predict the consequences of a warmer or cooler climate, except on a local basis, and even those predictions are suspect.

The world and all of its inhabitants are dynamic. They adapt to change. Some do better than others.

One golden rule is to do no harm. Hard to abide by if you don't know what you are doing to begin with.

One argument against evolution is devolution. IE there are no NEW species being developed as one would expect with evolution. What was the climate that caused the production of all known species. That climate certainly must be optimum as our current climate is only causing species to decline in number. One thing for certain, it probably wasn't a cooler climate. Heat produces more activity, cold produces less. A fact that is true for all known natural processes.