Quote:
Originally posted by snowman
I say give the worlds best scientists a challange.
How do we first prove the magnitude of this warming to a degree that is reasonable to act upon?
Of the methods to solve this assumed problem, how do we do it without ruining the world?
How do we do it in a way that maintains freedom for the people of the world? In other words without gov demanding all of us bow to their preconceived solutions. How do we do it with freedom of choice? People will always do in general whats best for all of us, thats capitalism. Say it dosen't work, YOU are DEAD WRONG!
How do we make certain all of those who deny capitalism and freedom end up dead? THere appears to be no other choice that maintains our freedom. Freedom is not free, it is worth dying for. [blah blah omitted]
|
I think someone needs to take a Valium.
Requiring cars to emit less pollution and get better fuel economy is a threat to freedom? Reducing pollution from power plants and encouraging more renewable energy is tyranny? Developing alternative fuels and energy conservation technology is anti-American?
Give me a break. When CAFE standards and catalytic converters came to Detroit, did you think that was the first crack in your freedom?
You are too emotional to think about this rationally, is my observation.