Quote:
Originally posted by lendaddy
If you find yourself defending the war in any way you are lambasted with the guilt of lives lost, as if zero was a possibility. Not a rational argument that they are unusually high for the mission, just the guilt stick for it's own sake. This is actually a fair approach if you are against ALL war, if that's your internal philosophy then the argument is genuine. Again, here that is not the case.
|
I'm curious why you feel it IS a fair approach if one is against ALL wars, but it's not a fair approach if one opposed to this particular war and is making the argument with regard to this particular war.
Do you view it as a fair approach if one is against ALL (unwarranted/unjustified/unnecessary) wars?
Help me to understand that distinction you are drawing.