[Jeff Higgins]

Kang, I'm sorry. I'm neither angry at you nor trying to discredit you in any way. Please accept my appology if what I said came accross like that; it wasn't meant to.

I'm merely trying to point out the absurdity, from a theological standpoint, of the video you linked. It attacks the existance of God on theological grounds, using the Bible as its resource. It attempts to disprove the existance of God by using scripture itself. Every bit as ridiculous as trying to prove the existance of God by using the Bible; many of you have objected to that (and I do too). So why do you find it acceptable to use it to disprove His existance?

All I am trying to say is that you would understand the absurdity of the points raised in that video if you had a more solid understanding of theology. The alleged "contradictions" or "inconsistancies" it tries to point out simply do not exist. They are based upon common missunderstandings held by those who have no theological foundation on which to stand. If you had that foundation, we could move right past this kind of nonsense and into some meaningful discussion. It is at this level that I see this conversation as "bogged down". Again, I would implore you to actually study the subject matter which you choose to debate.