Quote:
Originally posted by trekkor
I don't know how or why you say that.
|
I only say it because the whole ID phenomenon has been thrashed thoroughly in scientific circles and has been found to be without merit. Until it brings something else to the table, it is not worthy of discussion.
To repeat a quote from my previous post:
"The U.S. National Academy of Sciences has stated that intelligent design "and other claims of supernatural intervention in the origin of life" are not science because they cannot be tested by experiment, do not generate any predictions, and propose no new hypotheses of their own."
What predictions does ID make? How can it be tested by experiment?
Like I said, bring to light something that even the National Academy of Sciences hasn't seen yet or give it up. It's not worth arguing about.