[TimothyFarrar]

I can say from personal experience with scientists (some in the family, good thing they don't read pelican), that the objective evidence never comes up in any talk about global warming. And I have asked many times for the evidence. The answer is always, just as Chris says, it has been proven by many scientists. Now these people are objective people when it comes to solving solvable problems in their day to day lives.

Anyone care to take a stab in posting some numerical evidence that dis-proves the global warming craze?

This should be easy, only have to prove that the sun and natural processes have more control over the global temperature than man. They only have 2 thin legs to stand on, one that man is adjusting the atmosphere more than nature would alone (ie volcanoes, etc), and that the sun's energy output and earth's core temp have a lower flux than the results of man's green house gas output.

Another simple question is if the Earth was to transition into another ice age, could man produce enough green house gas to stop it.