[billyboy]

Ok. I erred by not pointing out that I didn't write the piece. I was mainly interested in the content, not where it came from. I guess, that to me anyway, it would be pretty clear from the content, that I didn't write that. I'll be more careful. I have edited it to clarify. I'm also not saying the article is right or wrong. Like most things, there is probably an element of each in it. I would imagine that any "conspiracy" between the characters mentioned only has to do with making money for themselves. What first got my interest was that on subjects I am intimately familiar with, I have seen errors in Wikipedia's interpretation of the subject and I see it oft quoted as if it were fact. The same observation holds true for media stories on subjects which I know about from first hand experience.