[Rick Lee]

Originally Posted by id10t

the SCOTUS has already ruled that the police have no obligation to protect individuals, but society as a whole.

If the state "grants" you the right to defend yourself (thats a whole different can-o-worms) then in my opinion, anyone who wishes to remove that right thru policy - court houses, air ports, schools, etc - should provide complete security for you while you are under their rules and either provide complete security to/from home/work/etc. on your normal daily errand runs/life, or provide a secure place for you to leave your weapon when under their rules/protection.

For example - I work at a college. If I have a CCP, and the college (or state legislature) says I can't carry while at work, then the college (or state) should be preparted to escort me from home to work and to errands after work until I return home. OR they should provide a secure location to lock my pistol up for the day (campus PD building) and then escort me to/from there to my office, classrooms, etc until I reclaim my pistol at the end of the day.

Oh, and the woman in the article is an idiot- concealed means that, if it was *that* important to her she'd take the stance of "better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6"

I concur. But in such cases I just opt for deep concealment and make certain it is totally undetectable. I ignore plenty of laws against CCW. Those places where you cannot be armed happen to be those places where you are most likely to face some derranged nut bent on mass murder.