View Single Post
Bill Verburg Bill Verburg is online now
Moderator
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 26,623
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by masraum View Post
ok, so, wouldn't that be the gross F in the upward direction, and the gross force in the downward direction would be .92, 1.84, ...

So then wouldn't the net force be the mass * the acc which in this case is actually 2.42m/s^2? The Force of gravity down minus the Normal Force (the chain links holding the bottom links up) should cancel each other out and the net force would be the upward acceleration which is only 2.42?

As I said 2 parts
static case, just hangeing there each link exerts a force to to counteract the force of gravity. up = down because it's not moving.

from lowest to highest
F = .094 * 9.8 = .9212N
F = 2 * .094 * 9.8 = 1.8424N
F = 3 * .094 * 9.8 = 2.7636N
F = 4 * .094 * 9.8 = 3.6848N
F = 5 * .094 * 9.8 = 4.606N

now add the imposed force that adds the additional 2.42m/s2 acceleration
again from lowest to highest
F= .094 * 2.42 = .22784N
F= 2 * .094 * 2.42 = .45496N
F= 3 * .094 * 2.42 = .68244N
F= 4 * .094 * 2.42 = .90992N
F= 5 * .094 * 2.42 = 1.1374N

add the 2 components( I rounded in the previous response hence the dicrepancy)

.9212N + .22784N = 1.14904N
1.8424N + .45496N = 2.29736N
2.7636N + .68244N = 3.44608N
3.6848N + .90992N = 4.59472N
4.606N + 1.1374N = 5.7434N

It's a lot easier to do the math if you first add the acceleration components then multiply, but it can be done either way.
__________________
Bill Verburg
'76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone)
| Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes |
Old 09-13-2007, 08:54 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #13 (permalink)