View Single Post
Joeaksa Joeaksa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: N. Phoenix AZ USA
Posts: 28,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by 450knotOffice View Post
Here's a link to the FIA's detailed statement. It is very long, but very interesting and includes some snippets of emails between the drivers and mechanics concerning Ferrari setup. I also find it interesting that Hamilton responded with no info for the FIA. My guess is he's lying and is simply playing the company line, which I suppose could be considered very loyal. However, the FIA made it very clear to the drivers that if it was found out later that they had withheld any info, the penalties would be huge. For his sake, I hope he really knew nothing about any of this, but I find that hard to believe.

http://www.planet-f1.com/story/0,18954,3213_2728560,00.html
What would sink Hamilton is if Alonzo or anyone else had copies of emails from/to him about this. This is sure to come out and if/when it does he has a problem.

That said, Alonzo and de la Rosa are already sunk, and they deserve it. Also, no one seems to mention that Ferarri has been as well monitoring McLaren's radio communications FOR YEARS now and no one has said a thing. If its legal for one team then its legal for all one would think.

Cannot wait for qualifing tomorrow to hear the discussion. It was really between two people,
__________________
2021 Subaru Legacy, 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins (the workhorse), 1992 Jaguar XJ S-3 V-12 VDP (one of only 100 examples made), 1969 Jaguar XJ (been in the family since new), 1985 911 Targa backdated to 1973 RS specs with a 3.6 shoehorned in the back, 1959 Austin Healey Sprite (former SCCA H-Prod), 1995 BMW R1100RSL, 1971 & '72 BMW R75/5 "Toaster," Ural Tourist w/sidecar, 1949 Aeronca Sedan / QB
Old 09-14-2007, 09:46 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #82 (permalink)