Quote:
Originally Posted by dd74
No. You have to hand it to the prosecution and the LAPD. It was up to them to not **** up a slam-dunk case, which they did anyway, particularly with how the blood evidence was handled.
Orinthal could have defended himself and gotten off.
|
Oh, you must not have worked in the crime lab for LAPD in the mid 90's. Because if you did, you'd know how we were always the sacrificial lambs when RHD was invovled in a case (still are).
There was blood evidence of ALL 3 in the Bronco between the front seat and the center console (I should know, I took it apart)...did that ever make it into the trial?...NOOOO! Why? THe DA's office couldn't prosecute their way out of a paper bag (or a leather glove for that matter. So, go ahead and blame the Lab, everybody else does...we're used to it.
It's nice to see that everybody and their mother knows how to do our job better due to all of the CSI shows now, but nobody ever gets it right because all of their information comes from T-fuchen-V.
I'm glad everybody can voice their opinions in this great country, it'd be boring if you couldn't
Cheers,
BTW, The Blake aquittal was my fault, too...I could figure out a way to levitate myself above the dumpster to pick through the garbage to locate the P-38 9mm.