Quote:
Originally Posted by Z-man
That is exactly my point -- you call it superstitious, while I call it spiritual. But no matter how you call it, you cannot prove it from a scientific perspective.
And while you feel that a biologist can explain emotions and such, do you really believe that science has an explanation for everything?
-Z-man.
|
This belief can certainly be called spiritual. It is not Stuart's or my or any else's obligation to disprove your extraordinary claims, it is your obligation to prove them or simply admit your belief is based upon "faith".
You cannot disprove the Great Teapot(s), but that does not prove Their existence.
And, science has a much better track record of explaining stuff than any of the world's religions.
FWIW.
Best,
Kurt
P.S.: I guess it was only a matter of time before this parallel of the "God" thread materialized.