[Lothar]

MFAFF,

I have heard that one source of Coughlan's unhappiness was the application of matrix management at McLaren. I have worked under a matrix org and understand some of the shortcomings. However, matrix management would support my contention that the loss of Coughlan would have minimal impact on the outcome of their design and development efforts. In fact, the loss of any one individual would have lesser consequences in a matrix compared to a very hierarchical structure.

Matrix does not require "vision" to be highly concentrated at the very top of the organization. I think this point is underscored by the success that continued in the aftermath of Adrian Newey's departure. So much emphasis was placed on the aero influence that Newey had. Yet, McLaren continued to develop unique aerodynamics well after Newey ceased contributing.

Regarding the paper trail, why would the paper trail hide the real input from engineers when no one knew there was any reason to scrutinize the paper trail? Virtually no one but a very few very late in the game had any idea that the degree to which MC contributed would become an issue.