|
A Man of Wealth and Taste
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Out there somewhere beyond the doors of perception
Posts: 51,063
|
To Lose a Battle, But To Win The War
"sorry pet peeve of mine (and I know tabs loves grammar like he loves his spoons).
The 2nd *implies* that the individual has the right to bear arms. Tabs (or anyone else) *infers* that when they read it.
Good explanation of this:
Communication consists of a message, a sender, and a receiver. The
sender can imply, but the receiver can only infer. The error that usually occurs is that the word infer is mistakenly used for imply.
WRONG: Are you inferring that I am a fool?
RIGHT: Are you implying that I am a fool?
If someone gets the idea from your behavior that you are a fool, then he is inferring that you are a fool. But if he is subtly letting you know that he thinks so, then he is implying that you are a fool. You, of course, can infer from his implication that he thinks you are a fool.
IMPLY = to put the suggestion into the message (sender implies)
INFER = to take the suggestion out of the message (receiver infers)
IMPLICATION = what the sender has implied
INFERENCE = what the receiver has inferred"
Nostatus
OK, OK so I'm a dimwit when it comes to grammer. How many times do I have to admit it.
However Nostatus you seem to have taken to heart what I said...and I say GOOD FOR YOU.
__________________
Copyright
"Some Observer"
|