Quote:
Originally Posted by Won
I thought both parties agreed that this was Wayne's house and we play by his rules. Wayne said no booby pictures, simple as that. Which part of that did you not get?
There are some people who "whine" about their spouse or kid seeing those pictures; then there are people including myself, Paul and Sammy whose basis was not our family looking over our shoulders but a genuine concern for the longevity of the forum when all the dirty contents get posted and linked. You crybabies never seem to get that point.
It does, however, make it easier for you to argue an invalid point when you generalize at your convenience, doesn't it?
|
Where/when did Wayne say this? Exactly, precisely, please provide a citation. I want to make sure exactly what I missed.
Once you've done that, bend your limited intellect around this --> Wayne has appointed moderators, whose actions are, by extension, his policy. And Z-man has allowed some pix of boobies; so ... focus hard here ... some pix are OK, some aren't... according to the Rules of Wayne, as practiced. And I've stipulated that Z-man does a pretty good job of determining acceptable.
Re-read the foregoing.
You obviously missed that subtlety in your haste to post a response ... ANY response. And include the word 'crybabies'. Done with you, fool. Jeff, if you think this tool has a point, do you want to try to make it for him?
If you cannot reconcile (much less meet) my request for a citation for "Wayne said no booby pictures, simple as that" and the actual practice that, through his agents the moderators, some level of exposure is OK, I can understand how your most dangerous rhetorical weapon is a rhetorical question; that completely misses the point.
JP