[svandamme]

i'm not going to go into any debate about it ,because i know you gun nuts are not going to change the point of view anyway

but this just doesn't make sense one way or another
if it's a gun free zone, then any shooting done and an damage done by a shooter
is not because the zone is gun free, but because the rules were broken, because somebody came in and took away the "free" part of "gun free zone" because the system, society failed (having plenty of other guns to start returning fire after a nutcase starts shooting is to late , you want to prevent the shooter from even getting out a gun in the first place)

"let's not fix the source of the problem, let's tinker with everything else"

and to be clear, the source of the problem is quite easy to define

crazy people
+
guns
= source of your problem

same goes for the other problem, criminal firearm offenses

criminals
+
guns
= source of that problem
take either part of that sum out ,and the problem is gone



this law just don't add up
why not sue the police, or the state, everytime somebody get's shot?

makes about as much sense to do as anything, at least if the idea is to keep looking for other ways to not put responsibility with the guy who pulled the trigger...
but i guess that doesn't go down well with the american mindset, there HAS to be somebody who pays for it, and since these nutcase shooters, usually end up dead in the ordeal, there isn't , so let's just blame whoever else you can...