|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: N. Phoenix AZ USA
Posts: 28,977
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Carlton
If you can, shoot RAW + JPEG. You'll have the ability to go back and correct white balance, exposure and other bad settings with the RAW file. If the camera supports compressed RAW, use it. There's no noticeable loss at all.
Make sure you have enough memory to do that. You can also "chimp" the camera- look at the LCD after your shot. If you know it's a loser, delete it to same memory space and post-processing time.
|
I shoot RAW and it works beautiful. Photos are large (30-40 megs each) but my God the quality.
Joe
__________________
2021 Subaru Legacy, 2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins (the workhorse), 1992 Jaguar XJ S-3 V-12 VDP (one of only 100 examples made), 1969 Jaguar XJ (been in the family since new), 1985 911 Targa backdated to 1973 RS specs with a 3.6 shoehorned in the back, 1959 Austin Healey Sprite (former SCCA H-Prod), 1995 BMW R1100RSL, 1971 & '72 BMW R75/5 "Toaster," Ural Tourist w/sidecar, 1949 Aeronca Sedan / QB
|