|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamburg & Vancouver
Posts: 7,693
|
D-I-V-O-R-C-E Question
A good friend of mine is going through a bitter divorce in California. A settlement of all assets seems to have been agreed after much grief, but there is one sticking point. He has a "deferred compensation plan" at the company at which he works. This will theoretically be paid out in 10 annual installments after he retires.
She wants half - and he's prepared to give her half - but the company refuses to put the plan in both names as a matter of policy. It has to remain in his name.
He could pay her out in present value - but there's an even chance the company may go under - in which case the deferred compensation plan disappears.
She is unwilling to accept a simple promise on his part to pay.
They are trying to find some sensible way to split this plan up right now - or secure her half interest in it - but have been unable to come up with any formula that works for them both.
They have been massively raped and pillaged by lawyers already - and are reluctant to go back to them again with this last detail.
Does anyone have any experience with this kind of thing? Any meaningful input will be appreciated.
__________________
_____________________
These are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.—Groucho Marx
Last edited by Dottore; 12-25-2007 at 03:50 PM..
Reason: spelling
|