Quote:
Originally Posted by john70t
Maybe the guardian/parents could be held liable for the zoo's legal costs associated with their children's actions, and the replacement costs of the tiger.
Did someone notify child services about negligence?
|
I agree, the punks were teasing the tiger, made it so he could get out and became dinner, fuch em, I hope the zoo sues them and wins!!!! What is that old saying
Don't Grab a Tiger by the Tail??
They shouldn't have shot the tiger either, but fed him the punk's parents
