Quote:
Originally Posted by BeyGon
Ineffectual? did you forget 9/11, the previous President was INEFFECTUAL.
GW inherited a major problem, not at all what you describe. I think it cost a lot to play the game in someone else's field, but still better than playing it in our own.
Stable only because the previous President refused to believe anything else.
As far as history, I still believe it will treat GW much better than the current bashers will like or expect.
Speeder
"The lead-filled asses of his dead-end supporters such as you are nothing but a further drag on America."
Funny, that is what I think about all you bashers of GW.
I would guess Algor and Kerry are very happy they lost, they couldn't have handled this pressure even as good as GW. We would be using prayer rugs by now with their apologist kiss but attitude.
|
Actually Pre-9/11 only the Democrats attempted to address the terrorist threat.
The most GWB was able to do was take 40 days of vacation in his first 9 months. He was alleged to have said he was 'tired of swatting at flies' in regard to Al Quaeda, but there's no evidence he went as far as swatting a fly.
The mindless mantra that Democrats were passive in regard to terrorism doesn't hold water. Accusing the other side of having your own weaknesses is a key tactic of this administration. Some people still may buy it, but the number has been dropping for about 7 years now...