[MRM]

Half truths and inuendo more than outright lies.

It is intellectually dishonest to bring up Obama's house, that he paid for with his book earnings, in relation to his state senate salary and then connect him to someone being charged with corruption completely unrelated to Obama and then say "it is unclear if he did anything to benefit Rezko during his brief four years in the U.S. Senate."

It's just intellectually dishonest. If Obama is doing something shady, show us the evidence. He's not, which is why saying things like this is a smear. I don't like liberals. I'm happy to engage them in the battle of ideas because we will always win over the fuzzy headed liberals when people take time to examine their ideas. But smearing people you opose instead of debating their ideas defeats the whole purpose of our political system and diminishes us as a country. That's what I expect out of the Clintons. I expect more out of a Conservative. True conservatives would rather lose honestly (like Goldwater) instead of winning dishonestly.