I believe there is something here -- notwithstanding book royalties. A home is not the only thing he had to pay for, and a "bestselling" book doesn't solve all financial woes.
Nor is it unthinkable that a person who COULD afford a $2million home would finagle with crooks so as
not to have to pay full price.
There's another article I'll look for, but, just so it doesn't go unnoticed ... the TIMES OF LONDON is publishing an investigative piece on Obama, while our own press is too busy with leg shivers and swooning... oh, except for a baseless hit piece on McCain by the NEW YORK TIMES (our non-agenda-driven, self-declared "Paper of Record").
EDIT: Here's a link to the
Times article.
Quote: Mr Obama now admits his involvement in this land deal was a “boneheaded mistake”.
JP