[WI wide body]

Let's inject a bit of truth in the "experience" debate. Most of the rhetoric about who is the most "experienced" candidate is almost laughable.

Clinton likes to take shots at Obama's obviously sparser resume while McCain trys to pretend that he is somehow the candidate with the great experience benefit. This is absurd.

The fact of the matter is that none of them have diddly ***** "experience" on any level that might prepare them for a presidency that requires executive decisions on domestic and international issues. The biggest decision that all three have ever had to make was per their Senate staffing and political campaigning. If you doubt this try to name any major executive or policy decision that any of them have ever made? Voted...yes. But never any true and positive decisions on an executive level.

It is ludicrous to pretend that any of them have any true presidential qualifications. None of them has ever held a true job or ran anything of note. We simply have to hope for the best regardless of who gets elected.

Obama probably has the least negatives since he has the smallest record. Clinton and McCain's resume are strikingly similar.
Clinton's "experience" per being in the White House with Bill is similar to McCain's "experience" in the military.

McCain was nothing more than pilot who unfortunately got captured and spent almost 6 years of his short military "career" in captivity. After being released in 1973 he did virtually nothing until he retired in 1981 and entered politics.