Quote:
Originally Posted by island911
hmmm, Supe ... why do you 'go personal' ...oh right; lack of counter arguments.
My point was, and is, we are not going to avoid 'climate change' via "carbon credits." ..."carbon credits" would not have kept the dinasours from extinction. --please counter or concede that point.
|
I'd agree that carbon credits are not going to be sufficient to eliminate the global warming spectre. But instead of whining about me "going personal," how about fessing up to the position that "global worming" is a hoax perpetrated by liberal politicians for nefarious purposes. The world finds this global warming thing interesting. You seem to dismiss it. Rather than pretend we are talking about something else, how 'bout finishing this first?
We went personal before. I assume you remember what that looks like. Ad hominem "why are you going personal" remarks are deflections, Island. Either this global warming thing is interesting, with many unanswered questions, or it's dismissed as though it is a hoax. What say ye?