|
Sonic...sorry, just saw your PM's and this thread. My brother is out of country fishing. Won't be back for another 2 weeks or so. I'll ask him when he gets back.
That being said, from a lawyer standpoint I agree with Dr Dogface. frpm an evidentiary standpoint, my bro's opinion would likely not be admissable as hearsay unless you had him to testify live. I think you be much better served getting a local vet or perhaps even your own vet to give a statement. It does sound like there might have been a malpractice based on the glucose tests.
Problem is as others state that you damages in the eyes of the law may be nominal; i;e;, the value of the animal. Have you thought about approaching it from a consumer protetction standpoint; i.e., price gouging etc? Just a hare brained thought.
|