Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny_Ocean
Then you can't carry it. My CCW has my name on it, not my LLC. On the other hand, if you can't get your sheriff to sign off, you can't have the weapon to carry anyway... 
Regardless, though. You ain't getting one of these into Calif. |
This will be challenged as the Heller decission discusses the arbitrary nature of the application of government action as being unconstitutional. Also, the decission goes into the very definitive discetion of the language of the amendment and what it says about "bear" really puts a huge burden on California chiefs and sheriff's. Remember these Chiefs and Sheriff's are elected officials, not beat cops or detectives. They are politicians, at least in California, they should not be confused with the police officers. Think of it this way, police are there to "protect and serve" and elected officials are there to "elect and serve (their polical connections)". So it will get interesting. The desenting opinion IMHO is pure and absolute fantasy. It is based on out of context material that although discused by the vast minority of the leaders opposed to the individual right to keep and bear arms, the very fact that the amendment was worded in the manner that it was is further testament as to the actual meaning and exactly what the MAJORITY of the founding fathers desired to be reserved, TO THE PEOPLE!