Quote:
Originally Posted by kstarnes
I understand that the QM and GR twain have not met, my point is simply that QM has practical applications . . . that have been applied materially.  So, at least, there is truth in part of the theory.
FWIW. |
True, QM does describe some things (and has predicted some things) that are real.
So did Newtonian mechanics, yet we know that it is not only wrong, but was built on a completely wrong basis.
Eventually, one of several things will happen:
1) QM will be shown to be wrong because Gravity will be applied to the microworld
2) Both Gravity and QM will be proven wrong by a totally new theory
3) Someone will find a way to install nonlinear mechanics into QM, and it may or may not meld with Gravity