Quote:
Originally Posted by stomachmonkey
Honestly, no sarcasm here, you have me more confused.
Rick has an issue with a law. He feels it provides additional "protection" to certain segments of our society.
I say that is not correct. It applies, (with the exception of some states and gays) to everyone.
If a _____ guy is walking down the street and a group of _____ guys yell, hey ______
and then proceed to beat him to a pulp simply because he is a _______ then that is a hate crime.
I am OK with that.
|
The cool thing is the law would prosecute in any case, hate or not. Adding "hate" to the equation is meaningless and should not be additive, which is the crux of your position.
It appears we'll have to agree to not agree...which I'm more then ok with.