Quote:
Originally Posted by speeder
OK, I'll take the bait. (Like an idiot). Hit me with your best group of climatologists not on some polluting industry's payroll that disputes current consensus on global climate change and its most probable causes and effects. Helps if it's actually a recognized organization of scientists. 
Look, I don't like climate change ("global warming") any more than you do. I want to race 2-stroke go-carts on cheap fuel and own a fast ski-boat that I pull around w/ my monster truck like any red-blooded American. The obstinate denial of overwhelming scientific opinion by some of you bozos reminds me of a little kid stomping his feet under the dinner table and screaming, NOOOO!!! WAHHHHH!!  |
The thing is, you have bought a "scientific" conclusion. But, in reality, it apears to be nothing more than a
political conclusion.
Any who conclude, or say they
know, just how much warming (or cooling) man has contributed to the plant need to show their work. Some do. So far, their work gets
flooded with red-marks all over, and the doom-sayer then sez:
NOOOO!!! WAHHHHH!! . . b'b'b'but I have people who will agree with me . . ..kinda
"