|
Is the arguement "global warming doesn't exist", or is the arguement "global warming exists but isn't caused by humans"?
You can't argue both, now.
When offering scientific data(which as we all know is bunk) as evidence of proof, a single point/year taken from a range over a long timeline is insufficient.
Kurt's graph shows a reduction of ice by almost half, within a sort 30 years. That's a huge amount of traditionally unchanging mass gone, and the represent energy absorbed is enormous. This falls far out of spec for the natural yearly freeze-thaw worldwide seasonal cycles.
One could argue that in another 30 years it will triple again, which may or may not prove true, but to not aknowledge an immediate massive pattern shift away from the historical range of normality speaks for itself.
|