What am I supposed to glean from this thread? I understand both sides (I think). Trek believes an experiment to create a black hole is a fruitless endeavor. Others believe the opposite.
My question is: why would this experiment
not be a waste of time? How will we know it is successful? What will we learn from it?
Fascinating stuff, btw. I don't understand two-thirds of what's being said here, but that's the fun of trying to follow, then figure out each person's post.