Quote:
Originally Posted by rouxroux
OK Kang...Here's a direct quote fromSB0099:
"Each class or course in COMPREHENSIVE sex education offered in any of grades K through 12 shall include instruction on the prevention of sexually transmitted infections, including the prevention, transmission and spread of HIV."
Now I don't know how they teach comprehension in your state, but that word I capitalized "comprehensive" to me means "all inclusive"...What say ye?
Now there is "age appropriate" language in the bill, but right there the word COMPREHENSIVE is pretty visible to me.
Oh, if you want to read the entire bill for yourself, go to www.ilga.gov/legislation
and click on "legislation & laws", then click "bills & resolutions", then type in SB0099 and look for Section 5. The School Code is amended by changing the Sections 27-9.1 and 27-9.2 as follows:
...so, in closing "comprehensive" is what is stated in the FIRST section. So that point can not be argued. |
Do you have a typo in the bill number? The SB0099 I find in that link is something about a Sudan Investment. Perhaps I am looking in the wrong place, but I am looking under “senate bills.”
In any case, Obama has made it clear that he does not support teaching full on comprehensive sec ed to kindergartners. What part of that do you no understand?
Again: “'Nobody's suggesting that kindergartners are going to be getting information about sex in the way that we think about it,' Obama said.” What part of this quote do you not understand? Obama is very clear here.
What that sentence you quoted says is what the comprehensive class will teach. While it does mention grade K, it does not state that the comprehensive class will be taught to grade K. Grade K will receive “age appropriate” sex ed.
Come on people, you don’t really believe these lies, do you? Do you really believe that Obama supports full on sex ed to kindergartners? That’s just crazy talk. It’s is really just warping the actual facts so that you can convince yourselves of that.
And it really is a low attack from McCain.
It really is “In referring to the sex-education bill, the McCain campaign is largely recycling old and discredited accusations made against Mr. Obama by Alan Keyes in their 2004 Senate race.”
What part of “discredited” in the sentence do you not understand?