Quote:
Originally Posted by jyl
So the questioner uses the word "commodity" to imply something inferior, infers that national means inferior, and then asks, in this circuitous way, should health care be national? Half the audience probably didn't understand what was being inferred. I can see why neither man wanted to touch that, or didn't want to admit that they didn't understand it. Don't they screen these questions?
|
I disagree, commodities are bought and sold on the open market and implies the current system infers is inferior to a nationalized one because the term is used in a perjorative manner
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOA NOM
It was another way of asking whether health care should be nationalized. The answer, of course, is no.
|
Not according to Mr Obama
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun 84 Targa
Preventive health care is cheaper than reactive health care.
|
100% true, impossible to enact by fiat, unless of course you are willing to give up the dangerous habits you currently enjoy, riding a motorcycle for example.
Unless of course you agree with Mr McCain that it is a responsibility, rather than a right.
Is this thread in the right venue?