|
I understand you guys' viewpoints and would like to send you my resume' Jeff. I think I would be very effective at evaluating the young, slender, large-breasted females.
But that points to an interesting observation. To some, large breasts, long legs and slender waists are acceptable and Byron is offensive. But to others (wives, for instance) the unacceptable appearance is the large breasted yougn female with the slender waist. Beauty...and obscenity....appears to be in the eye of the beholder.
Sometimes, Group 1 points at Thing A and says "that's offensive, make it unlawful" and Group 2 points at the same thing and says "That makes me feel good, I appreciate and support its appearance." Conversely, Group 2 might be offended by what Group 1 finds meaningful and important. When this happens, we tend to call the Things "Art" and protect them as expressions.
Why do we consider nudity to be so offensive and obscene? (I know the answer to this, but want to see who else does)
__________________
Man of Carbon Fiber (stronger than steel)
Mocha 1978 911SC. "Coco"
|