Quote:
Originally Posted by Drdogface
He is just DOING it with no approval from legislature or voters as I understand it....construction to begin in 2011.
?
|
No, he isn't. He can't. He doesn't have that power. He doesn't have that money. It doesn't work that way. If it happens, someone else has to spend that money. Either the state or federal legislature has to decide to spend that money. The governor can't do it. He can't spend a penny that the legislature doesn't give him to spend.
He is part of a group that supports the idea. That group has called to "ease federal and state environmental review standards" pertaining to the development and construction of the peripheral canal, rather than following existing environmental laws and processes". That's it. That's your end run.
They feel the environmental regulations are excessively restrictive and don't pertain to this project.
If you agree or disagree, fine. But leave it at that without the over-the-top accusations.
Quote:
Peripheral Canal
The Peripheral Canal does not physically exist. As an idea, it is a canal that diverts water from the Sacramento River, through (or around the periphery of) the San Joaquin-Sacramento River Delta, and into the California Aqueduct, North Bay Aqueduct, South Bay Aqueduct, and San Luis Canal via the Jones and Banks pumping stations. then be pumped to Central and Southern California (including San Francisco Bay Area water providers, like Santa Clara Valley Water District). Construction costs for the project are estimated at between $4 and $7 billion, with an additional $30 billion in land easements.
Currently, that water is being pulled through the San Joaquin-Sacramento River Delta. The through-Delta system has turned the Delta, originally a fluctuating-salinity estuary, into a freshwater basin. It has also created unnatural north to south flows in the Delta, confusing native species such as the Delta Smelt and disturbing the ecosystem.
Voters defeated a ballot initiative to build the Canal in 1982. Ever since then, the words "Peripheral Canal" have been called the "third rail" in water politics.
In recent years, however, after Judge Wanger shut off pumping stations in the South Delta because of their environmental impact, the idea of a Peripheral Canal has had a revival. Among others, Tom Birmingham, the head of the Westlands Water District, Tim Quinn, the director of the Association of California Water Agencies, and Governor Arnold Schwarznegger's Blue Ribbon Delta Vision Panel have fallen in line with the idea, although the Delta Vision Panel did not rate it as its primary goal.
|