[RPKESQ]

Nostatic,

There is much to consider here.The caliber choice seems to be .357 so now it is your intended use that is the most important consideration. Most Colts (Pythons, Diamondbacks, etc.) using the older 1890's lock-work design are smooth action guns, but much weaker for full power .357 loads. They will wear far quicker and loose thier timing much sooner than the S&W's.

Of course you can always shoot low power .357 rounds (this would require hand-loading) but an easier and less costly solution is to obtain a Ruger or S&W. Taurus builds some very strong revolvers too.

Unless appearance or collecting values are the top of your list, the Colts just do not warrant the cost and you will lose value by using them anyway.

A single action is a great gun to have, history and practicality in one package. I have never felt underarmed in civilian life with a single action. On the other hand a small .357 makes a great carry piece and you will not have to leave cartridge cases at the shooting scene! Look at the small 12+ oz. S&W .357 snub-nose.

For all those who think a S&W.500 would make a good home defense weapon, stop watching TV and movies for your firearm knowledge and obtain some real expertise. Why don't you try shooting a S&W .500 in a typical small space (like your living-room, hallway or bedroom) in the dark and without ear protection. Let me know how that worked out after you stop your ears from bleeding. Even a .357 is blinding and deafening inside.

The lack of practicality here is comical at best.