[OwenM]

I have considered the GS, but I find the ergonomics a little odd and not that comfortable for me, it’s also unnecessarily high as I have no need of the ground clearance, something which the Tiger is guilty of as well.
The R1200ST may be ugly from the front, but the GS is unattractive from any angle as far as I am concerned and it does not seem to offering better comfort or equivalent wind protection. The ST and GS motor and chassis are very similar as is the weight, so I really don’t see the point in a GS for my use. A fully optioned R1200ST is much cheaper to buy used then a similar GS, probably because they are unpopular.
I would be interested in feedback from anyone who has ridden a R12ST

As far as the Triumphs go they are not as well made as a BMW, but they do seem functional and sturdy, suspension is apparently quite good by all reports. Unless you get the optional Ohlins BMW suspenders are nothing special.

I test rode a K1300S a while back and it did not appeal at all, it would have to be the most boring bike I have ridden; I would rather drive a cage. I suspect the R12ST may also be a little unexciting which is why I keep coming back to the Triumphs which offer more “fun factor”. No use riding a long distance to get to a great road and not have the bike to enjoy it.