View Single Post
hobieboy hobieboy is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Up North
Posts: 1,449
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurboKraft View Post

One result of this mis-matching is higher exhaust backpressure at the turbine inlet (header) flange. 930s are bad enough, and the long, undersized tube feeding the wastegate on most aftermarket headers doesn't help matters, either.
Anyone else have exhaust backpressure data they would like to share?
We just dyno tuned an ex-Ruf 3.4L that had been in storage for many, many years. Another shop converted it to EFI and "600hp" -- not with a K29-7006#13, buddy! At 17.2psi boost in the manifold, the exhaust backpressure was just a hair under 30psi. About a 1.75:1 pressure ratio (backpressure:boost) despite the larger #13 turbine housing. Car is choking on the backpressure, spooling up slowly, keeping the Group B cams from doing their work.
Perhaps a little off topic but I'm curious...

Would a larger diameter header (say from the standard 1 5/8" to 1 3/4") help to reduce the backpressure? Or is it something else?

thanks!
__________________
87 930 K27HFS/B&B/Twin-Plug... Megasquirted
Old 08-19-2009, 12:21 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #85 (permalink)