Quote:
Originally Posted by KaptKaos
... there is an implied quid pro quo when there is a sexual relationship between the boss and an underling and therefore it's defacto harassment.
...there is still some logic in the position.
|
That is truly an absurd position.
Substitute "boss" with "male" ,and "underling" with "female"...and you have the logical extension of that argument.
All sex now becomes "harassment" because of the implied quid pro quo.
Looney Tunes.