[johnnywishbone]

there is a reason ufc is making boxing #2. both areas have their superstars. in a
perfect match-up, mma provides a more entertainment/emotional/real deal experience. i really suspect "fixing" or intentional lop-sided match-ups done to elevate contestant market appeal in some cases. some, like TITO ORTIZ, who fought for free while in college, TANK ABBOT, and a short list of others, were the real deal when in their "prime". remember the beginning, when the "head butt" was still legal?
i don't do "pay per view" boxing or mma. remember the so called rope-a-dope "tactic"
used by mohammed ali? CASSIUS CLAY would have pulverized his a$$.