View Single Post
jyl jyl is online now
Registered
 
jyl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nor California & Pac NW
Posts: 24,812
Garage
Thanks everyone.

I have wood siding over lath and plaster exterior walls, zero added insulation. I guess this is pretty typical of 100 y/o construction. I have no plans to cut holes in the walls and foam in insulation, because its so expensive that (so far) I can't see a financial payoff over 10 or even 15 years. The attic is finished so there is limited scope to add insulation there.

Since starting this thread, I've calculated that the windows we plan to replace represent appx 1% of the exterior surface of the house. I've also looked up the R-values of lath/plaster walls (around 5, supposedly), of good double pane windows (seeing a wide range of claims, from 3 to 6), and of the best triple pane, krypton filled, low E windows (also seeing a wide range of claims from 6 to 8). I'm thinking that even if the double pane is R=3 and the triple pane is R=8, the difference to my house's heat loss from replacing 1% of the exterior surface with triple pane rather than double pane is - well, pretty much nothing.

So my inclination is to look for a decent double pane low E argon filled vinyl window, ideally good enough to get the 30% tax credit, from a solid local installer - that is not Penguin.
__________________
1989 3.2 Carrera coupe; 1988 Westy Vanagon, Zetec; 1986 E28 M30; 1994 W124; 2004 S211
What? Uh . . . “he” and “him”?
Old 12-29-2009, 10:44 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #19 (permalink)