Quote:
Originally Posted by m21sniper
The int was not the deciding play of the game. As ALL THREE announcers on NFL network said, it was not that bad of a play considering the circumstances, it didn't cost them the game.
Not gaining a single yard on 1st and 2nd down, then getting a 12 man in the huddle penalty...AND losing 3 fumbles is what lost them the game.
|
Please explain the logic here. If he throws it out of bounce they have a shot at a game winning field goal. If he runs they have a better shot at a game winning field goal. If he throws it to the wide open receiver on the 20 they have an even better shot at the game winning field goal. So "considering those circumstances" why wasn't it that bad of a play that he chose to commit the cardinal sin of running one way and throwing back across the field. And if it wasn't "that bad of a play", what could he have done on that play that would have been worse than what he did?