[Tobra]

Dottore, you have not made even a single persuasive point.

1. The law is stupid, which is not only irrelevant but untrue.

2. She was sexually mature and consented to it, which she obviously did not, or he would not have to drug her and she would not have been crying and begging him to stop. Sexually mature, is that the old enough to bleed, old enough to breed axiom?

3. He had a deal with the judge and was afraid it would not be honored, so he is a psychic pedophile, that sort of stretches credulity, and he could have just said, "Forget it, I withdraw my plea, lets go to trial."

4. He has a history as a ladies man. He loves women, he does not hate them. Man that is ridiculous, he has a history of nailing little girls, that makes him a pedophile, not a ladies man. John Wayne Gacy loved little boys, he was just a misunderstood clown, n'est pas? The victim wants to let it go and get on with her life? Of course she does, she was raped as a child, and paid off by the perpetrator.

5.The US Govt is corrupt, so are the Swiss, so the rearrest is bogus. Seriously dude, that is an argument, are you freakin' kidding me?

6. The judge was corrupt, the law is stupid, the DA was sketchy etc, etc

One question for you Dot.

If you had a 13 year old child, who was drugged and raped, what would you do?

Leaving aside you think the law is stupid, or the rapist in question is willing to give you a sack of cash to let it go, or a good dancer, or an artistic genius, or his parents died in a concentration camp, or any of the other irrelevant nonsense you dredge up whenever we talk about this POS degenerate, recidivist pedophile who has certainly nailed numerous children.

You have a 13 year old daughter and she is raped. That is really the only pertinent fact, what do you do?