[Milu]

Sorry Adrian your reasoning is fallacious.

A point here, a point there, and then we're winging it with the dragons on Magic Mountain.

My religious views are my own, I respect those of others but I do not like to see iffy reasoning used to defend anything, especially the metaphysical.

1) Cannot prove God exists..............OK

2) Cannot prove God does not exist............OK

(We shall skip over the fact that more experienced theologians and philosophers than me and possibly you have attempted both,
Thomas Moore, (or am I thinking of Thomas Aquinas, seven incontrovertible proofs for the existence of God?), and Bertrand Russell come to mind and on the whole I feel Bertrand Russell's reasoning has the edge)

3) If you cannot prove something, you cannot disprove it........... A little simplistic and not necessarilly so.

4) "Ergo God exists".........SORRY DO NOT UNDERSTAND HOW YOU MADE THIS LEAP IN LOGIC!

However, if you believe the reasoning is correct then Planter91C's tongue in cheek response to your post is also correct and your rebuttal is only you denying it, not a valid logical argument.