[Racerbvd]

Originally Posted by Joeaksa

Looks like we have another child molester fan on the board!

Considering the number of posts he has, might even be Polanski himself!

Dot you have a boyfriend now! Hope he is young and not too fast

Joe A

(Who feels that child molestors should be taken out of the courthouse and SHOT in the gut and left to bleed to death)

One has to wonder if they belong to the same club????
No reasonable person defends the action of a child molestor

Curley v. NAMBLA
In 2000, a Boston couple, Robert and Barbara Curley, sued NAMBLA. According to the suit, Charles Jaynes and Salvatore Sicari, who were convicted of murdering the Curleys' son Jeffrey, "stalked ... tortured, murdered and mutilated [his] body on or about October 1, 1997. Upon information and belief immediately prior to said acts Charles Jaynes accessed NAMBLA's website at the Boston Public Library." According to police, Jaynes had eight issues of a NAMBLA publication in his home at the time of his arrest. The lawsuit further alleges that "NAMBLA serves as a conduit for an underground network of pedophiles in the United States who use their NAMBLA association and contacts therein and the Internet to obtain child pornography and promote pedophile activity."[23] Jaynes wrote in his diary, "This was a turning point in discovery of myself.... NAMBLA's Bulletin helped me to become aware of my own sexuality and acceptance of it [...]."[24]}}

Citing cases in which NAMBLA members have been convicted of sexual offenses against children, Larry Frisoli, the attorney representing the Curleys, argued that it is a "training ground" for adults who wish to seduce children, in which men exchange strategies on how to find and groom child sex partners.[25] He also claims that NAMBLA has sold at its website what he calls "The Rape and Escape Manual" that details how to avoid being caught and prosecuted. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) stepped in to defend NAMBLA as a free speech matter and won a dismissal based on the fact that NAMBLA is organized as an unincorporated association, not a corporation. John Reinstein, the director of the ACLU Massachusetts, said that although NAMBLA "may extol conduct which is currently illegal", there was nothing on its website that "advocated or incited the commission of any illegal acts, including murder or rape".[26] The Curleys continued the suit as a wrongful death action against individual NAMBLA members, some of whom were active in the group's leadership. The targets of the wrongful death suits included David Thorstad, a co-founder of NAMBLA and well-known writer. The Curleys alleged that Jaynes and Sicari, who were convicted of the rape and murder of their son, were members.

In April 2005, the wrongful death cases were still being considered by a Massachusetts federal court, with the ACLU assisting the defendants on the grounds that the suit violated their First Amendment rights to free speech.[23][27] The lawsuit was dropped in April 2008 after a judge ruled that a key witness was not competent to testify.[28]