[Taz's Master]

If I was firm in my understanding of what I believed art was, I'd either tell you what it is and explain how wrong you are (where we disagree), or more likely keep my comments to myself. Quantifying the subjective is difficult, if not impossible (which is why I think educating yourself about art to better appreciate it is both useful and pointless). If I felt you were not putting thought into your responses I wouldn't continue asking questions. I'm not trying to prove you wrong, this discussion can certainly impact the way I think about art, and I'm greatful for the consideration you are giving my questions.

I'm not sure whether I agree with your response: it is that output, whether it be a painting, photo, drawing...that is the art object. The object or setting that the art object is based on is the subject of the object. I kind of agree with what you are saying, but I cannot keep from thinking: "If that is so, then the only way to appreciate the art in an object/setting is to reproduce it" which I cannot agree with.