Quote:
Originally Posted by berettafan
you are playing games with words now frenchy. you won't say the pattern isn't larger from the shorter bbl (because you KNOW it must be, however minutely so) so you simply say i won't 'see' it. you also conveniently presume the use of deforming lead (or similar) shot and not steel which, in the good ol' US of A is mandatory for migratory birds.
indeed i've spent time drawing 30" circles and counting pellet holes (from my own loads with carefully weighed charges) and very often the answer wasn't apparent with just a glance at the pattern.
it's not that i think you are WRONG frenchy...in any of this really....but that you are playing games with it. is this a common tactic for you?
you make statements that would only REALLY apply to a very small % of shooters. yet you don't qualify your statements.
|
The games you see here are the games you are creating in your head. I am careful of how I phrase things and with word choice.
I stated "I'm sorry to say that if you build test barrels that are identical in every respect you will definitely not be able to see the differences between a 10" , 18" or 28" barrel with modern loads."
Let me elaborate for you. You will not be able to measure a difference when you take an average of 10 shots from each barrel length, if the test barrels match exactly in all parameters (except length) and each shot from all the barrels is the exact identical load.
If you think it works differently please post the evidence.