Quote:
Originally Posted by gt350mike
I'm leaning towards re-constructive surgery too. Keep in mind that it was a BPA (Blanket Purchase Agreement) which would imply that they only wanted to have an agreement in place and not actually purchased the implants......which still makes no sense to me.
I guess Seahawk will have to chime in to save the Navy on this one.
|
If it's for re-constructive surgery for veterans then all good.
I'm an ex medic Australian Army. I saw some pretty awful injuries in my time.